- - Talk CPython Internals and Learning Python with pythontutor.com
- - Talk Write an Excellent Programming Blog
- Extras
- Joke
Opening Arguments - OA35: The Emoluments Clause (w/Seth Barrett Tillman) Part 1
- Here's the Raw Story report on disqualified Trump electors, and the full text of the report can be downloaded from Alternet.
- Prof. Tillman can be found on Twitter at @SethBTillman, and here is his professional page.
- In November of 2016, Prof. Tillman wrote a brief piece for the New York Times summarizing his thesis about the Emoluments Clause.
- This 2009 Memorandum from the President's Office of Legal Counsel assumes -- without argument or citation -- that the Emoluments Clause applies to the President.
- In December of 2016, Norm Eisen, Richard Painter, and Laurence Tribe wrote a paper for the Brookings Institution arguing that the Emoluments Clause does apply to the President.
- Zephyr Teachout's law review article, The Anti-Corruption Principle sets forth her argument that the Constitution, including the Emoluments Clause, enshrines a fundamental principle to protect against corruption of our highest offices, including the Presidency.
- Tillman's Opening Statement, Citizens United and the Scope of Professor Teachout’s Anti-Corruption Principle is here.
- Teachout's specific response to Tillman on the Emoluments Clause is here.
- Tillman's reply to Teachout can be found here.
- Teachout's final reply to Tillman can be found here.
The Stack Overflow Podcast - Stack Overflow Podcast #98 – Scott Hanselman Is Better Than Us at Everything
On this week's episode, Joel rants about travel for the first time ever, Jay explains the Developer Survey (launched last week), and the hosts ponder the reason for Connecticut's existence. Also, our friend Scott Hanselman tells us what we should be doing.
Pod Save America - “Congress scares easy.”
Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett and Tommy Vietor talk about the rallies to preserve ACA, Trump’s twitter war with John Lewis and his creepy embrace of Russia. Then they’re joined by Erin Gloria Ryan to discuss covering the Trump White House and Philippe Reines talks about playing Donald Trump.
PHPUgly - 45:Sockets Edition
Show notes: https://phpugly.com/blog/45sockets-edition recorded January 12th, 2017 Topics Atlassian acquires Trello 2016 Laravel Survey MongoDB ransacked GitHub secret key finder released to public The End for 'BackPage' Adult Services Ads Why you shouldn't trust Geek Squad ever again What we learned visualizing 5,000 GitHub accounts in 24 hours The hosts Eric Van Johnson Twitter / Github / Blog / About.me Tom Rideout Twitter / Github / About.me John Congdon Twitter / Github Follow us on Twitter @PHPUgly Email us at Podcast@phpugly.com Sponsor of this show: The DiegoDev Group DiegoDev Group
Cato Daily Podcast - Remembering Nat Hentoff
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Start the Week - Sara Khan: The Battle within Islam
On Start the Week Tom Sutcliffe discusses what Islam means in the modern world. Graeme Wood has spent his career getting to know Islamist fundamentalists to try to understand the apocalyptic ideology and theology at the heart of the so-called Islamic State. Sara Khan campaigns to reclaim her faith from extremism, while Ziauddin Sardar argues that Islam demands reason and critical inquiry from its believers. Loretta Napoleoni 'follows the money' to uncover the millions made by those exploiting the destabilisation of Syria and Iraq and the rise of ISIS. Producer: Katy Hickman
Photo: Sara Khan Credit: Joe McGorty.
Song Exploder - Solange – Cranes in the Sky
Solange Knowles released her first album in 2002, at the age of 16. Her third album, A Seat at the Table, came out in September 2016, and debuted at #1 on the Billboard charts. It’s gotten widespread critical acclaim, including being named album of the year by Pitchfork and by Vibe. In this episode, Solange takes apart the song "Cranes in the Sky," which began back in 2008.
Serious Inquiries Only - SIO7: An Atheist and a Christian Walk into a Bar…
Curious City - “Who’s Your Chinaman?”: The Origins Of An Offensive Piece Of Chicago Political Slang
Complete with video and archival images, we track down the offensive phrase’s roots and consider whether it’s time to retire it.
