- We first discussed Maajid Nawaz's legal threats in Episode 83 and Episode 84. You can read the final Settlement Agreement for yourself as well as check out the SPLC's apology to Nawaz.
- Click here to read the Snopes article conclusively debunking the political claim that this policy was put into place "by Democrats."
- You can read Trump's recent Executive Order and also check out the original 1997 Flores v. Reno settlement.
- The operative laws discussed during the main segment were: 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (asylum); 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (“improper entry by alien”); and, of course, 18 U.S.C. § 46 (“transportation of water hyacinths”). You can also read the Attorney General's Interim Decision #3929 on refugees for yourself.
- As promised, this is the full list of Class B federal misdemeanors.
- We also discussed this Washington Post article on refugees being turned away at the border.
- This is the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Pereira v. Sessions.
- Finally, a secret Yodel for you folks who read the show notes: here's the link to the news that Michael Cohen's fired his old lawyers (McDermott, Will & Emery) and hired a new one (Guy Petrillo). What does this mean? Only time will tell.
Opening Arguments - OA184: Families at the Border
Today's Rapid Response Friday helps separate fact from fiction when it comes to the heartwrenching issue of families being separated at the border. Is the Trump administration to blame? Did the recent Executive Order fix the problem? Listen and find out. First, though, we bring back (almost) everyone's favorite segment: Andrew Was Wrong! Specifically, Andrew was wrong when he predicted back in Episode 83 that Maajid Nawaz didn't have much of a defamation case against the Southern Poverty Law center, and in Episode 84 that he didn't have much leverage, either. Well, both of those predictions looked foolish now that the SPLC has agreed to pay Nawaz $3,375,000 and issue an unconditional apology. In the main segment, we break down Trump's EO regarding separating families at the border and requesting a modification to the Flores v. Reno settlement. It's bad. And if it weren't bad enough, we also discuss the administration's change in asylum policy. After that, we discuss the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Pereira v. Sessions. Surely that can't be bad news, too? (Don't call us Shirley.) Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #81 involving the constitutionality of a state legislature retaliating against two professors for pushing campus speech codes. Have we piqued your interest yet? Listen and find out! And if you'd like to play along , just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag. We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry! Recent Appearances Andrew was recently a guest on the David Pakman Show, with a two-part appearance discussing whether President Trump can be indicted and if so, whether he can pardon himself. You can watch the video on YouTube. Show Notes & Links